<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Notes | kaguc — Writing to understand systems.</title><link>http://kaguc.com/notes/</link><atom:link href="http://kaguc.com/notes/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Notes</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>The failure of good decisions</title><link>http://kaguc.com/notes/sum-of-good-decisions/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://kaguc.com/notes/sum-of-good-decisions/</guid><description>&lt;p>A pattern I keep seeing but haven&amp;rsquo;t pinned: people make good decisions, each
individually defensible, and the &lt;em>sum&lt;/em> is bad. Worse than that — the sum is
what you would have specifically tried to avoid if you&amp;rsquo;d described it up front.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Possible names: &amp;ldquo;local optimization,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;constraint blindness.&amp;rdquo; Neither fits.
Local optimization has a global frame implied; this is a thing that happens
&lt;em>because nobody is keeping the global frame&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Coming back to this.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Systems thinking, edge case</title><link>http://kaguc.com/notes/systems-thinking-as-hammer/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://kaguc.com/notes/systems-thinking-as-hammer/</guid><description>&lt;p>The thing nobody mentions about &amp;ldquo;systems thinking&amp;rdquo; is that it can become
&lt;em>the&lt;/em> lens — i.e. the next universal hammer.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I caught myself this week treating a deeply specific problem (a particular
failure of a particular team) as if it were an instance of a feedback loop.
It wasn&amp;rsquo;t. It was just three people who hadn&amp;rsquo;t slept enough.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The discipline isn&amp;rsquo;t to use systems thinking. It&amp;rsquo;s to know when &lt;em>not&lt;/em> to.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>On rereading Buffett's 1989 letter</title><link>http://kaguc.com/notes/on-rereading-buffett/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://kaguc.com/notes/on-rereading-buffett/</guid><description>&lt;p>The thing that hits me on the third pass is how much of it is the &lt;em>shape&lt;/em>
of an argument I already half-knew, presented in a way I would have flinched
from at twenty-five.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The famous lines aren&amp;rsquo;t the best lines. The best lines are the operational
ones: &lt;em>&amp;ldquo;the most important quality&amp;hellip; is willingness to wait.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Note to self: stop saving the famous quotes. Save the operational ones.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>