<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Decisions | kaguc — Writing to understand systems.</title><link>http://kaguc.com/tag/decisions/</link><atom:link href="http://kaguc.com/tag/decisions/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Decisions</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>The failure of good decisions</title><link>http://kaguc.com/notes/sum-of-good-decisions/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://kaguc.com/notes/sum-of-good-decisions/</guid><description>&lt;p>A pattern I keep seeing but haven&amp;rsquo;t pinned: people make good decisions, each
individually defensible, and the &lt;em>sum&lt;/em> is bad. Worse than that — the sum is
what you would have specifically tried to avoid if you&amp;rsquo;d described it up front.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Possible names: &amp;ldquo;local optimization,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;constraint blindness.&amp;rdquo; Neither fits.
Local optimization has a global frame implied; this is a thing that happens
&lt;em>because nobody is keeping the global frame&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Coming back to this.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>