<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Reading | kaguc — Writing to understand systems.</title><link>http://kaguc.com/tag/reading/</link><atom:link href="http://kaguc.com/tag/reading/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Reading</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>On rereading Buffett's 1989 letter</title><link>http://kaguc.com/notes/on-rereading-buffett/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://kaguc.com/notes/on-rereading-buffett/</guid><description>&lt;p>The thing that hits me on the third pass is how much of it is the &lt;em>shape&lt;/em>
of an argument I already half-knew, presented in a way I would have flinched
from at twenty-five.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The famous lines aren&amp;rsquo;t the best lines. The best lines are the operational
ones: &lt;em>&amp;ldquo;the most important quality&amp;hellip; is willingness to wait.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Note to self: stop saving the famous quotes. Save the operational ones.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>